| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sam@tdi

Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 648 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 7:17 am Post subject: Turbocharging or Supercharging, why not both? |
|
|
First built this on paper around 4yrs ago with a fellow mega geek engineer, finally got a chance to build it for Pro Time Attack this year
Eaton charger being pressure fed by a turbo, water to air heat exchanges after both compressors.
It's still very very new at the moment but learning a lot about the set-up very quickly, she's running competitively for the first time tomorrow, fingers crossed.
From an engine management control point of view we're using the following;
Active engine health monitoring, Oil press, Oil temp, Coolant Press, G/box temp, etc.
Variable intake cam timing
VTEC camshaft profile switching
Closed loop turbo wastegate control
Active knock control
DBW throttle
Closed loop supercharger bypass valve control
Traction control
Paddle triggered air shifted sequential gearbox _________________ Sam Borgman
www.facebook.com/torquedevelopments
www.tdi-plc.com
www.rototest.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roberto Arano
Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 361 Location: colorado
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice! Much more interesting than most builds!
Is the S.C de-clutched (in addition to bypass) after turbo spool to remove the drive loss? We did a mag-clutch once on a twin charged car once, both to remove the parasitic, but also to avoid over-revving the S.C (we had to spin it fast down low).
Keep us updated! _________________ www.circuitse7en.net
http://stores.ebay.com/Circuit-Se7en |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skylinegtrhr
Joined: 14 Oct 2009 Posts: 30 Location: Croatia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Really nice set up, looking forward for Yours experience with this set up against twinscrool set up, as we have excellent experience with Full race kits (no lag and no overheating problems in hi revs) but always open mind for new stuff  _________________ http://www.nistune.nissan-club.hr/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Warpspeed
Joined: 05 Jun 2006 Posts: 483 Location: Melbourne
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That looks really good !
I have built quite a few twincharged cars over the years, and helped a few others with their twincharged projects.
Absolutely the very best way.
It offers the greatest advantages of both supercharging and turbocharging without being handicapped by the well known disadvantages of either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xenocron
Joined: 06 Dec 2003 Posts: 162 Location: Jersey
|
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
K-Series! Very nice!
Would be interested to see the shape of that dyno curve. _________________ EFI University East Coast Instructor
www.xenocron.com
845-504-5340
Specializing in Honda/Acura Applications |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Warpspeed
Joined: 05 Jun 2006 Posts: 483 Location: Melbourne
|
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xenocron wrote: | K-Series! Very nice!
Would be interested to see the shape of that dyno curve. |
Flat and fat I would bet.
With zero lag. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sam@tdi

Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 648 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Firstly thanks for the great comments guys, the primary motivation here was to use the super charger to increase the exhaust gas energy available for the turbo's operation. The problem this ultimately aims to address is that it reduces the time delay normally associated with change in torque demand from the driver and then that demand being met in the tyres contact patch.
So the first track running did not go to plan, after only a few laps of 8/10ths running the water system pressure sensor was telling the story of combustion pressure entering the cooling system so we pulled the car in from track and retired it.
After having the engine apart and the head bolts out we can measure that they have all stretched well beyond the upper service limit, the multi-layer gasket was starting to bridge accross from the combustion chamber to coolant jacket between the laminates of the gasket. So an upgrade from M11 head bolts to M12 head studs made from a different material is now in progress.
The 42mm turbo waste gate is proving too small for the amount of exhaust energy we have and our minimum turbo speed is a lot higher than I would ideally like, so we're re-manufacturing the exhaust manifold and system in order to accommodate a 62mm waste gate.
Fuel pump flow was also looking a little too marginal for our liking so we're spec'ing a new more powerful unit and bigger lines.
All should be back together in the next couple of weeks so once it's then been back on the dyno and properly cal'd I'll get some graphs and data up.
In the mean time here's a couple of pics of the car all assembled...
Massive Attack by 4oClock, on Flickr
 _________________ Sam Borgman
www.facebook.com/torquedevelopments
www.tdi-plc.com
www.rototest.com
Last edited by sam@tdi on Wed May 15, 2013 5:14 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flr Power

Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How much power is the engine pushing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sam@tdi

Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 648 Location: London, England
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wolf_Tm250
Joined: 26 Aug 2006 Posts: 196 Location: Parma - Italy
|
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Really nice dyno graph! _________________ TM enduro 250 2s.[55](2s is better than 4s)
Toyota Celica Gt-Four ST205 [588.25Nm@4957rpm]
EFI 101 + Advanced classes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flr Power

Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, excellent job with the set up. It looks like the supercharger does a good work from 2000-4000rpm, after that the turbo seems to pick up the work.
Very flat linear torque curve with a lot of power for a 4cyl 2.1 liter engine. That must feel very good to drive with all that linear power. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
C. Ludwig
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sam, I'm very interested in this setup. Looking to try something similar on a Miata. What size supercharger are you using? Are you bypassing the blower with the turbo? If so, how? I'm looking to use an MP62 and the internal bypass isn't going to flow enough (looking for a max of 500 crank HP) to allow a complete bypass of the blower, which I'd like to do. Thoughts?
Very impressive results! _________________ Haltech, AEM, Apexi PFC Sales, Installation, Tuning
Custom Harness Solutions
www.ludwigmotorsports.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roberto Arano
Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 361 Location: colorado
|
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'v used a modified throttle body for the bypass before, i even took advantage of the tps on it to provide data for setting up the bypass transition. On mine I used the T.I.P to pilot the actuator on the bypass , an elegant solution as it indicated when the turbo spooled more specifically than MAP does because of the supercharger/turbo combo. _________________ www.circuitse7en.net
http://stores.ebay.com/Circuit-Se7en |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
C. Ludwig
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Roberto Arano wrote: | | I'v used a modified throttle body for the bypass before, i even took advantage of the tps on it to provide data for setting up the bypass transition. On mine I used the T.I.P to pilot the actuator on the bypass , an elegant solution as it indicated when the turbo spooled more specifically than MAP does because of the supercharger/turbo combo. |
What closes this second throttle plate? If it's wide open and you back off the main throttle, the turbo is still able to push air into the intake. _________________ Haltech, AEM, Apexi PFC Sales, Installation, Tuning
Custom Harness Solutions
www.ludwigmotorsports.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sam@tdi

Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 648 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
The super charger is just a little Eaton M62, the turbo is a Garrett GTX35R with a 1.06ar exhaust housing, and now a 62mm wastegate.
The charger bypass is around 42mm and it's sprung closed in it's native position, we're using pre-charger (charger mouth) pressure onto the bypass actuator in order to open it, we're running a simple mechanical dawes device in the line in order to give some control as to the opening point. The maximum bypass of the charger is around 65-70%.
She's hitting the track at Snetterton for the first time next Friday so I guess we'll see just how well the uprated Honda drive shafts will last  _________________ Sam Borgman
www.facebook.com/torquedevelopments
www.tdi-plc.com
www.rototest.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
C. Ludwig
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sam@tdi wrote: | The super charger is just a little Eaton M62, the turbo is a Garrett GTX35R with a 1.06ar exhaust housing, and now a 62mm wastegate.
The charger bypass is around 42mm and it's sprung closed in it's native position, we're using pre-charger (charger mouth) pressure onto the bypass actuator in order to open it, we're running a simple mechanical dawes device in the line in order to give some control as to the opening point. The maximum bypass of the charger is around 65-70%.
She's hitting the track at Snetterton for the first time next Friday so I guess we'll see just how well the uprated Honda drive shafts will last  |
Perfect! That's exactly what I was looking for. The system I'm looking to put together on a 1.7L B6 is to also use the M62. Thinking either a GTX28 or 30 series turbo. My concern was having enough turbo flow bypass the blower to make use of the improved efficiency of the turbo. Looks like it's working a treat for you at much higher power levels than I care to attempt.
Thanks Sam and Roberto! _________________ Haltech, AEM, Apexi PFC Sales, Installation, Tuning
Custom Harness Solutions
www.ludwigmotorsports.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sam@tdi

Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 648 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cool, the real trick hear is in the heat exchanges after the turbo and the supercharger, they need to be ultra efficient but low internal gas volume, especially for inside the plenum. That said I would actually have a larger exchanger core post charger if I could package it, as it stands it's around 60mm deep and about 110% of cross section of the blower outlet flange.
We're seeing about 79-80% efficiency out of the smaller core in the plenum but 91-92% from the post turbo exchanger array.
Don't be scared of going big on the turbine side selection, even with this really loose exh housing on the GTX35R it is putting 0.25bar on the nose of the charger at 2000rpm, the spool up is far more gradual than if just turbo alone. _________________ Sam Borgman
www.facebook.com/torquedevelopments
www.tdi-plc.com
www.rototest.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrDomino

Joined: 01 Oct 2009 Posts: 188 Location: Indianapolis, IN
|
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How do size the WG? Is there an equation you use or is it mostly just from experience? _________________ I am a Mechanical Engineer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sam@tdi

Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 648 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MrDomino wrote: | | How do size the WG? Is there an equation you use or is it mostly just from experience? |
Well we were able to quantify the exhaust gas volumes generated by the engine when just supercharged with reasonable accuracy and we thought we'd been able to estimate the thermal and kinetic energy as well, we then tried to extrapolate out those numbers to give us a clue as to what would happen with the turbo augmenting the density on the blower inlet.
In reality we had massively underestimated the eventual exhaust gas energy by at least 20-25%, we went with the 62mm wastegate in the end not because we thought we needed it all, but because we didn't want to risk going around the loop a third time, we wanted to "be sure"... as it happens I would now estimate that we're actually using the 62mm wastegate to approx 80% of it's capacity at certain times so it wasn't a bad call
I think cam timing and the shear amount of exhaust valve opening duration present on these standard DC5 cams played a part in fudging our numbers, the NA bias cams certainly pop the exhaust valve open earlier in the cycle than we normally would for a forced induction power plant. _________________ Sam Borgman
www.facebook.com/torquedevelopments
www.tdi-plc.com
www.rototest.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrx
Joined: 05 Nov 2005 Posts: 487
|
Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent Work!!! Very very impressing!
Tq and Power are amazing... must be hell of a car to drive. Especialy with the sequential gearbox  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|