| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
C. Ludwig
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:45 am Post subject: Turbo Compressor Efficiency? |
|
|
Someone car to check my math? Using the formula:
Efficiency =
(Pressure Ratio^.28 v Absolute Inlet Temp) - Absolute Inlet Temp
Absolute Outlet Temp- Absolute Inlet Temp
We're playing with pre-turbo water/methanol injection and the numbers are too good to be true. I'll give two sets of test numbers below. The first set was with a .75 GPH nozzle and straight water. The second set was with a 2.0 GPH nozzle and 50/50 water/methanol.
5000rpm 16.7psi 2.1PR 583 Inlet ABS 698 Outlet ABS 120%
6000rpm 16.2psi 2.1PR 582 Inlet ABS 732 Outlet ABS 90%
5000rpm 15.8psi 2.1PR 568 Inlet ABS 645 Outlet ABS 167%
6000rpm 16.8psi 2.1PR 567 Inlet ABS 671 Outlet ABS 130%
We haven't tried no injection to get an idea of what those numbers would be. However, referencing other data from other cars, the formula and my math seem to be accurate. I just see no way that we're seeing over 150% efficiency. One thing that comes to mind is the sensor being too slow to register the temp rise and we're actually much hotter on the outlet than we're recording. It's a standard GM open-element air temp sensor that we're using.
Thoughts? _________________ Haltech, AEM, Apexi PFC Sales, Installation, Tuning
Custom Harness Solutions
www.ludwigmotorsports.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arnout
Joined: 21 Oct 2005 Posts: 146 Location: Haarlem, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pre turbo? what RPM does that turbo spin and what happens to the drops of water then? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
C. Ludwig
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At well over 200*F the water and methanol vaporize. That's what creates the charge cooling effect.
No idea on turbine speed. The expense of a turbine speed sensor is outside the scope of this project. _________________ Haltech, AEM, Apexi PFC Sales, Installation, Tuning
Custom Harness Solutions
www.ludwigmotorsports.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stevieturbo
Joined: 29 Aug 2006 Posts: 845 Location: Northern Ireland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dkGoodrich dot com
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 159 Location: Frankfort KY
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very interesting! _________________ http://www.dkGoodrich.com
KY's Fastest Honda's, Acura's & Subaru's
Dyno cell with a 2010 Mustang Load Dyno. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Slides
Joined: 13 Jun 2008 Posts: 120 Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
To calculate the efficiency correctly you need to account for the energy absorbed by the evaporation of the liquids. I remember seeing threads somewhere in the past where otherwise logical "engineers" claimed that the AI increased the efficiency of the compressor, not so, the heat energy absorbed by the mass is pretty much the same it is just that the injectants reduce the temp rise.
Unfortunately you can't do it with a basic spreadsheet, need to run a macro with lookups & cases etc & probably iterations to account for phase changes, different vapour pressures etc, so it is a massive PITA even if you try to do it roughly with pen & paper for a specific case. _________________ mazda Rx, you'd think they were full of truffles  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grocerius Maximus
Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 169 Location: McKinney TX USA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A turbocompressor is a ratiometric device, the denser the air inlet conditions, the higher the mass flow rate at max speed, or any equivalent speed for that matter. The power difference between the same turbo at max speed sucking in 150F radiator waste heat or 60F outside air is HUGE.
Speed sensor kits can be had for $250.00 USD.
Bet way to think about compressor 'efficiency' is how much shaft power it takes to move that mass of air at that PR. When you improve the efficiency of the compressor the TURBINE expansion ratio goes down, and your turbine inlet pressure drops. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liborek
Joined: 10 Apr 2010 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Grocerius Maximus wrote: | | Best way to think about compressor 'efficiency' is how much shaft power it takes to move that mass of air at that PR. When you improve the efficiency of the compressor the TURBINE expansion ratio goes down, and your turbine inlet pressure drops. | Precisely.
DeltaT in compressor is influenced by PR, efficiency and of course heat capacity of given compressed composition. But few degrees here and there isnt problem when setup is intercooled.
Impact on turbine inlet pressure is much more interesting and vital.
So is it safe to assume that monitoring wheel speeds and turbine inlet pressure, taking into account slight change in mass flow and absolute temperature pre turbine by influence of injectant, could tell if compressor efficiency is really somewhat higher with preturbo injection?
Hope someone will understand what I´m asking  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Slides
Joined: 13 Jun 2008 Posts: 120 Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The point is technically, lifting a mass flow to the same pressure with teh same compressor will give it the same heat.
But, with the injectant, the same mass flow can be achieved at a lower pressure ratio as it is coming out cooler, so the turbo is doing less work for the same mass flow, & hence less turbine inlet pressure for the same mass flow= less exhaust pumping loss & more power from the same air mass.
So, assuming the same compressor inducer conditions, even if you are at the flow limit of the compressor for a significant part of your rev range, by limiting your shaft speed to only what is required to maintian the pressure required at max turbo flow at that engine speed & the lower PR required by the cooler intake charge you achieve more power making hte engine system as a whole more efficient. _________________ mazda Rx, you'd think they were full of truffles  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|