EFI University - fuel injection tuning education and training
FREE Electronic Fuel Injection Newsletter!
Feature articles, tuning tips,
and more!
 
 
EFI University
Electronic Fuel Injection Tuning Forum
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Turbo Compressor Efficiency?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EFI University Forum Index -> Other
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
C. Ludwig



Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 244

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:45 am    Post subject: Turbo Compressor Efficiency? Reply with quote

Someone car to check my math? Using the formula:

Efficiency =
(Pressure Ratio^.28 v Absolute Inlet Temp) - Absolute Inlet Temp
Absolute Outlet Temp- Absolute Inlet Temp


We're playing with pre-turbo water/methanol injection and the numbers are too good to be true. I'll give two sets of test numbers below. The first set was with a .75 GPH nozzle and straight water. The second set was with a 2.0 GPH nozzle and 50/50 water/methanol.

5000rpm 16.7psi 2.1PR 583 Inlet ABS 698 Outlet ABS 120%
6000rpm 16.2psi 2.1PR 582 Inlet ABS 732 Outlet ABS 90%

5000rpm 15.8psi 2.1PR 568 Inlet ABS 645 Outlet ABS 167%
6000rpm 16.8psi 2.1PR 567 Inlet ABS 671 Outlet ABS 130%

We haven't tried no injection to get an idea of what those numbers would be. However, referencing other data from other cars, the formula and my math seem to be accurate. I just see no way that we're seeing over 150% efficiency. One thing that comes to mind is the sensor being too slow to register the temp rise and we're actually much hotter on the outlet than we're recording. It's a standard GM open-element air temp sensor that we're using.

Thoughts?
_________________
Haltech, AEM, Apexi PFC Sales, Installation, Tuning
Custom Harness Solutions
www.ludwigmotorsports.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arnout



Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 146
Location: Haarlem, The Netherlands

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pre turbo? what RPM does that turbo spin and what happens to the drops of water then?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
C. Ludwig



Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 244

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At well over 200*F the water and methanol vaporize. That's what creates the charge cooling effect.

No idea on turbine speed. The expense of a turbine speed sensor is outside the scope of this project.
_________________
Haltech, AEM, Apexi PFC Sales, Installation, Tuning
Custom Harness Solutions
www.ludwigmotorsports.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevieturbo



Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 845
Location: Northern Ireland

PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Extensive discussion here about it.

http://www.aquamist.co.uk/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=17

And from their testing, there is no risk to the impellor when an atomised liquid is sprayed.
_________________
LS1, V7 YSi Very Happy

9.85 @ 144.75mph
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dkGoodrich dot com



Joined: 18 May 2010
Posts: 159
Location: Frankfort KY

PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very interesting!
_________________
http://www.dkGoodrich.com
KY's Fastest Honda's, Acura's & Subaru's
Dyno cell with a 2010 Mustang Load Dyno.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Slides



Joined: 13 Jun 2008
Posts: 120
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To calculate the efficiency correctly you need to account for the energy absorbed by the evaporation of the liquids. I remember seeing threads somewhere in the past where otherwise logical "engineers" claimed that the AI increased the efficiency of the compressor, not so, the heat energy absorbed by the mass is pretty much the same it is just that the injectants reduce the temp rise.

Unfortunately you can't do it with a basic spreadsheet, need to run a macro with lookups & cases etc & probably iterations to account for phase changes, different vapour pressures etc, so it is a massive PITA even if you try to do it roughly with pen & paper for a specific case.
_________________
mazda Rx, you'd think they were full of truffles Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Grocerius Maximus



Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 169
Location: McKinney TX USA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A turbocompressor is a ratiometric device, the denser the air inlet conditions, the higher the mass flow rate at max speed, or any equivalent speed for that matter. The power difference between the same turbo at max speed sucking in 150F radiator waste heat or 60F outside air is HUGE.

Speed sensor kits can be had for $250.00 USD.

Bet way to think about compressor 'efficiency' is how much shaft power it takes to move that mass of air at that PR. When you improve the efficiency of the compressor the TURBINE expansion ratio goes down, and your turbine inlet pressure drops.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Liborek



Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grocerius Maximus wrote:
Best way to think about compressor 'efficiency' is how much shaft power it takes to move that mass of air at that PR. When you improve the efficiency of the compressor the TURBINE expansion ratio goes down, and your turbine inlet pressure drops.
Precisely.
DeltaT in compressor is influenced by PR, efficiency and of course heat capacity of given compressed composition. But few degrees here and there isnt problem when setup is intercooled.

Impact on turbine inlet pressure is much more interesting and vital.

So is it safe to assume that monitoring wheel speeds and turbine inlet pressure, taking into account slight change in mass flow and absolute temperature pre turbine by influence of injectant, could tell if compressor efficiency is really somewhat higher with preturbo injection?

Hope someone will understand what I´m asking Embarassed Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Slides



Joined: 13 Jun 2008
Posts: 120
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The point is technically, lifting a mass flow to the same pressure with teh same compressor will give it the same heat.

But, with the injectant, the same mass flow can be achieved at a lower pressure ratio as it is coming out cooler, so the turbo is doing less work for the same mass flow, & hence less turbine inlet pressure for the same mass flow= less exhaust pumping loss & more power from the same air mass.

So, assuming the same compressor inducer conditions, even if you are at the flow limit of the compressor for a significant part of your rev range, by limiting your shaft speed to only what is required to maintian the pressure required at max turbo flow at that engine speed & the lower PR required by the cooler intake charge you achieve more power making hte engine system as a whole more efficient.
_________________
mazda Rx, you'd think they were full of truffles Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EFI University Forum Index -> Other All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

©2007 EFI University